Is Insulin Glargine (Lantus) Associated with Increased Risk of Cancer?

Spread the love

Researchers conducted 11 in vitro studies on human and mice cells to determine whether insulin glargine might cause the mitogenesis, or cell growth, of cancerous cells.

Spread the love

Is Insulin Glargine (Lantus) Associated with Increased Risk of Cancer?Insulin glargine is an analog for human insulin, meaning that it is an altered form of insulin not produced by the human body, but still able to be used by the human body in a way similar to actual insulin. In the United States, insulin glargine is marketed by Sanofi-Aventus under the name Lantus. When used to supplement human insulin production, it is released in small concentrations over a 24 hour period into the blood, which means that it can be taken once a day for long-lasting insulin management

Insulin glargine functions over time because it contains a modified domain that prolongs its interaction with the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, or IGF-IR. However, many types of cancer patients show an overactivity of IGF-IR, leading some to believe that use of insulin glargine may be associated with the development cancer if it is continually interfacing with IGF-IR. But is there any truth to that hypothesis?

Researchers conducted 11 in vitro studies on human and mice cells to determine whether insulin glargine might cause the mitogenesis, or cell growth, of cancerous cells. The results showed that the insulin glargine promoted mitosis in 5 malignant cell cultures as well as one nonmalignant culture. Insulin glargine, overall, had a 10 percent to 60 percent greater mitogenic effect than regular human insulin.

Five more studies were conducted to investigate the risk that insulin glargine may have in causing cancer in humans. One study showed that treatment with insulin glargine alone was associated with a slightly higher risk of cancer in patients who had been diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, with those receiving greater doses being more at-risk.  However, a later analysis of the results that was adjusted for age and sex to ensure the objectivity of the results actually showed that insulin glargine had a protective effect on the study participants. The results were controversial and were heavily debated; however, three more studies were conducted which did not appear to show any increased risk of cancer from regular insulin glargine treatment.

The fifth and final study did find that female patients treated with insulin glargine alone appeared to show an increased risk for breast cancer compared to patients who had been treated with both insulin glargine and human insulin. Again, the findings of this study were the subject of debate as the authors did not take into consideration other risk factors for breast cancer, so the apparent increased risk of breast cancer may have simply been the result of random fluctuations in frequency. The authors came to the conclusion that the data did not provide a strong enough link to prove a causal relationship between insulin glargine use and the development of cancer compared to other types of insulin-based therapies.

The Food and Drug Administration released a new safety announcement in January 2011 regarding their review of insulin glargine and any possible links to cancer. The FDA determined that the evidence so far has been inconclusive since the studies and their methodology were questionable. However, the FDA continues to work with the medication‘s manufacturer as well as the Department of Veterans Affairs to determine whether there is a risk of developing cancer associated with the use of insulin glargine.

The American Diabetes Association, The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, and the European Medicines Agency have all stated that there is currently no need for any change in the use of insulin glargine treatment.

Author: Staff Writers

Content published on Diabetic Live is produced by our staff writers and edited/published by Christopher Berry. Christopher is a type 1 diabetic and was diagnosed in 1977 at the age of 3.

Leave a Reply